Under strict/absolute liability, when is a party held completely liable?

Under strict or absolute liability, a party is held completely liable when they engage in activities that are considered inherently dangerous. This legal concept does not depend on the level of care taken by the party involved in the activity; instead, it focuses on the nature of the activity itself. Inherently dangerous activities pose a significant risk of harm to others, regardless of the precautions that are taken to mitigate risks.

For example, if a company is involved in the transport of hazardous materials, they may be held strictly liable for any accidents or spills that occur, even if they followed all safety regulations and protocols. This principle ensures that individuals or entities engaged in high-risk activities are responsible for the consequences that arise from those activities, which promotes greater accountability and safety standards.

In contrast, the other scenarios outlined do not fit the strict liability framework. Acting negligently involves a failure to exercise reasonable care, intentional injury implies a deliberate act leading to harm, and having no proof of negligence would mean that the basis for liability is not established. Thus, it is the inherent danger of the activity itself that triggers strict liability, making this the correct understanding of the principle.